<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>IPHere</title> <atom:link href="http://www.iphere.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.iphere.com</link> <description>We show your current IP</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 02:14:30 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>Annual e-Discovery Demands, Expenses Skyrocket</title><link>http://www.iphere.com/annual-e-discovery-demands-expenses-skyrocket</link> <comments>http://www.iphere.com/annual-e-discovery-demands-expenses-skyrocket#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 02:14:30 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Annual]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Demands]]></category> <category><![CDATA[EDiscovery]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Expenses]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Skyrocket]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/annual-e-discovery-demands-expenses-skyrocket</guid> <description><![CDATA[The good news is companies are becoming increasingly familiar with predictive coding, but the more unsettling news is they are facing up to $ 20 million in annual e-discovery expenses. According to the third annual study of streamlining and reducing the cost of e-discovery on inside counsel at mostly Fortune 1000 companies, 81% of respondents [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.iphere.com/annual-e-discovery-demands-expenses-skyrocket/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>FAST Paper Casts Doubt on SSD Future</title><link>http://www.iphere.com/fast-paper-casts-doubt-on-ssd-future</link> <comments>http://www.iphere.com/fast-paper-casts-doubt-on-ssd-future#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 20:13:56 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Casts]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Doubt]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Fast]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Future]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Paper]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/fast-paper-casts-doubt-on-ssd-future</guid> <description><![CDATA[At last month&#8217;s FAST (File and Storage Technologies) conference researchers from UCSD and Microsoft Research presented a paper, titled The Bleak Future of NAND Flash Memory, that&#8217;s put the rosy all-flash-all-the-time future predicted by some in doubt for the long term. The gist of the paper&#8217;s argument is that the physics of flash, and the [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.iphere.com/fast-paper-casts-doubt-on-ssd-future/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>AppSense Unveils Smartphone Encryption</title><link>http://www.iphere.com/appsense-unveils-smartphone-encryption</link> <comments>http://www.iphere.com/appsense-unveils-smartphone-encryption#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 14:23:40 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[AppSense]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Encryption]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Smartphone]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Unveils]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/appsense-unveils-smartphone-encryption</guid> <description><![CDATA[DataLocker, which will enable smartphone users to encrypt sensitive information in personal cloud services like Dropbox, is the first product to come out of the new research arm created by virtualization technology provider AppSense. Intended to create new computing technologies geared at both end users and IT, the focus of AppSense Labs will be &#8220;to [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.iphere.com/appsense-unveils-smartphone-encryption/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Nook Tablet Is Not Really a Kindle Fire Threat</title><link>http://www.iphere.com/nook-tablet-is-not-really-a-kindle-fire-threat</link> <comments>http://www.iphere.com/nook-tablet-is-not-really-a-kindle-fire-threat#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 08:13:09 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Fire]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Kindle]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Nook]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Really]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Tablet]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Threat]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/nook-tablet-is-not-really-a-kindle-fire-threat</guid> <description><![CDATA[Barnes and Noble is preparing to launch a new Nook Tablet designed to go head-to-head with the Amazon Kindle Fire at $ 199. The Nook Tablet seems like a solid, capable device, but it is more likely to offer competition for Android tablets in general than for the Kindle Fire. On one level it seems [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.iphere.com/nook-tablet-is-not-really-a-kindle-fire-threat/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Cisco And Deloitte Wrong: Good Practices More Impactful Than Vendor Choice</title><link>http://www.iphere.com/cisco-and-deloitte-wrong-good-practices-more-impactful-than-vendor-choice</link> <comments>http://www.iphere.com/cisco-and-deloitte-wrong-good-practices-more-impactful-than-vendor-choice#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 02:13:36 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Choice]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Deloitte]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Good]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Impactful]]></category> <category><![CDATA[More]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Practices]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Than]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Vendor]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Wrong]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/cisco-and-deloitte-wrong-good-practices-more-impactful-than-vendor-choice</guid> <description><![CDATA[Cisco is fighting back against the notion that a multi-vendor network can simplify operations and reduce TCO. The networking giant commissioned a report by Deloitte that finds operation costs will increase over the life of the equipment in a network that uses equipment from disparate vendors. The fact is, one vendor vs. multiple vendors is [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.iphere.com/cisco-and-deloitte-wrong-good-practices-more-impactful-than-vendor-choice/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Virtual Backup Challenges Enterprise IT</title><link>http://www.iphere.com/virtual-backup-challenges-enterprise-it</link> <comments>http://www.iphere.com/virtual-backup-challenges-enterprise-it#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 20:14:52 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[backup]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Challenges]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Enterprise]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Virtual]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/virtual-backup-challenges-enterprise-it</guid> <description><![CDATA[Organizations continue to remain challenged when it comes to ensuring data is adequately protected and recoverable, even though advances have been made in backup and data protection technology, industry observers say. Among the reasons cited are that data protection processes don&#8217;t get reviewed frequently enough, there are few SLA requirements, and a lack of visibility [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.iphere.com/virtual-backup-challenges-enterprise-it/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Google Privacy Fiasco Lesson: There Is No Privacy</title><link>http://www.iphere.com/google-privacy-fiasco-lesson-there-is-no-privacy</link> <comments>http://www.iphere.com/google-privacy-fiasco-lesson-there-is-no-privacy#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 14:15:17 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Fiasco]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Google]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Lesson]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[There]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/google-privacy-fiasco-lesson-there-is-no-privacy</guid> <description><![CDATA[Google is in some hot water for bypassing privacy controls on the Safari Web browser in iOS devices&#8211;and allegedly on Internet Explorer as well&#8211;to surreptitiously track users’ online activities. While Google deals with the backlash and regulatory scrutiny from the FTC, there is an important lesson to be learned: privacy is dead. I am not [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.iphere.com/google-privacy-fiasco-lesson-there-is-no-privacy/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>EMC VFCache: Project Lightning Strikes</title><link>http://www.iphere.com/emc-vfcache-project-lightning-strikes</link> <comments>http://www.iphere.com/emc-vfcache-project-lightning-strikes#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 08:17:03 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Lightning]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Project]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Strikes]]></category> <category><![CDATA[VFCache]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/emc-vfcache-project-lightning-strikes</guid> <description><![CDATA[EMC&#8217;s recent announcement of the culmination of the code-named Project Lightning resulted in the new VFCache solution, a server-based flash cache, which may be used as a complement or alternative to flash storage that appears as if it were a disk drive. This lightning strikes twice, though not in the same spot. The first is [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.iphere.com/emc-vfcache-project-lightning-strikes/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Nicira&#8217;s Network Virtualization Platform Release Raises Questions</title><link>http://www.iphere.com/niciras-network-virtualization-platform-release-raises-questions</link> <comments>http://www.iphere.com/niciras-network-virtualization-platform-release-raises-questions#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 02:16:15 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Network]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Nicira's]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Platform]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Questions]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Raises]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Release]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/niciras-network-virtualization-platform-release-raises-questions</guid> <description><![CDATA[Nicira, which has just emerged from stealth mode, says it has cracked the code to deliver true network virtualization. The company claims its Network Virtualization Platform brings the capabilities and benefits of server and storage virtualization to the network, addressing what has been a physical barrier in the path to further virtualization progress. The news [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.iphere.com/niciras-network-virtualization-platform-release-raises-questions/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Microsoft India Store a Victim of Poor Data Security, Not Hackers</title><link>http://www.iphere.com/microsoft-india-store-a-victim-of-poor-data-security-not-hackers</link> <comments>http://www.iphere.com/microsoft-india-store-a-victim-of-poor-data-security-not-hackers#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:15:58 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[data]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Hackers]]></category> <category><![CDATA[India]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Poor]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Store]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Victim]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/microsoft-india-store-a-victim-of-poor-data-security-not-hackers</guid> <description><![CDATA[The online Microsoft Store in India was hacked – allegedly by a group of Chinese hackers. The big story, though, isn’t that the site was hacked, or that customer data was compromised and exposed by the attackers, but that the Microsoft Store was storing the data in clear text and didn’t take basic steps to [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.iphere.com/microsoft-india-store-a-victim-of-poor-data-security-not-hackers/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
