<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>IPHere &#187; Amdahl</title> <atom:link href="https://www.iphere.com/tag/amdahl/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>https://www.iphere.com</link> <description>We show your current IP</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 14:13:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en-US</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator> <item><title>Could EMC Become The Amdahl of Cloud Storage?</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/could-emc-become-the-amdahl-of-cloud-storage</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/could-emc-become-the-amdahl-of-cloud-storage#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 08:38:24 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Amdahl]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Become]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cloud]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Could]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/could-emc-become-the-amdahl-of-cloud-storage</guid> <description><![CDATA[There is no doubt that EMC has shipped some Atmos storage since its introduction. Yes, EMC has Atmos. And the company claims that Atmos is specifically designed for the cloud. However, I believe that there are fundamental issues with the way EMC sells Atmos to customers. First of all, if Atmos is cloud storage, then [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/could-emc-become-the-amdahl-of-cloud-storage/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>