<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>IPHere &#187; Bridges</title> <atom:link href="https://www.iphere.com/tag/bridges/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>https://www.iphere.com</link> <description>We show your current IP</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 14:13:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en-US</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator> <item><title>AMD Trinity: Intel Ivy Bridge&#8217;s New Rival</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/amd-trinity-intel-ivy-bridges-new-rival</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/amd-trinity-intel-ivy-bridges-new-rival#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 20:12:44 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Bridges]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Rival]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Trinity]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/amd-trinity-intel-ivy-bridges-new-rival</guid> <description><![CDATA[AMD released its Trinity chips Tuesday, its second generation A-series APU (accelerated processing units.) These low-power chips are intended for ultrabook-like laptops, traditional laptops, and some all-in-one desktops. Trinity offers better performance and lower power utilization than the previous AMD Llano family of chips. The new chip designs call for about 10% more transistors on [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/amd-trinity-intel-ivy-bridges-new-rival/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Infoblox Bridges Management Gap Between Physical And Virtual Networks</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/infoblox-bridges-management-gap-between-physical-and-virtual-networks</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/infoblox-bridges-management-gap-between-physical-and-virtual-networks#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 16:53:06 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Between]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Bridges]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Infoblox]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Management]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Physical]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Virtual]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/infoblox-bridges-management-gap-between-physical-and-virtual-networks</guid> <description><![CDATA[Currently addressing the network infrastructure automation and control requirements of large organizations, Infoblox has set its sights on bridging the management gap between physical and virtual networks. Officially launched on Monday, Infoblox IPAM Insight, an IP address management (IPAM) product, started shipping in mid-January on the Infoblox-1102 appliance platform with pricing starting at $ 14,995. [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/infoblox-bridges-management-gap-between-physical-and-virtual-networks/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>