<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>IPHere &#187; Charges</title> <atom:link href="https://www.iphere.com/tag/charges/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>https://www.iphere.com</link> <description>We show your current IP</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 14:13:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en-US</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator> <item><title>Intel Charges Ahead With WCT Wireless Power Standard</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/intel-charges-ahead-with-wct-wireless-power-standard</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/intel-charges-ahead-with-wct-wireless-power-standard#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 02:14:58 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ahead]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Charges]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Power]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Standard]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Wireless]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/intel-charges-ahead-with-wct-wireless-power-standard</guid> <description><![CDATA[Whether it&#8217;s corralling the unruly herd of cords beneath a desk or jockeying for position near the lone outlet at a cafe, few computer or smartphone users have been spared the frustrations of keeping their devices powered. And tech vendors are racing to provide users with an alternative to fighting over a power outlet. Intel [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/intel-charges-ahead-with-wct-wireless-power-standard/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Could You Be Liable for Charges Resulting from Google Wallet PIN Crack?</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/could-you-be-liable-for-charges-resulting-from-google-wallet-pin-crack</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/could-you-be-liable-for-charges-resulting-from-google-wallet-pin-crack#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:23:34 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Charges]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Could]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Crack]]></category> <category><![CDATA[from]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Google]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Liable]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Resulting]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Wallet]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/could-you-be-liable-for-charges-resulting-from-google-wallet-pin-crack</guid> <description><![CDATA[The Google Wallet system appears to be under siege. Over the past couple days, two different methods of potentially cracking or circumventing the PIN security protecting Google Wallet have been revealed. What’s worse is that you could potentially be liable for fraudulent charges racked up with Google Wallet. The initial revelation wasn’t much of a [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/could-you-be-liable-for-charges-resulting-from-google-wallet-pin-crack/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>