<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>IPHere &#187; Choice</title> <atom:link href="https://www.iphere.com/tag/choice/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>https://www.iphere.com</link> <description>We show your current IP</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 14:13:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en-US</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator> <item><title>Cisco And Deloitte Wrong: Good Practices More Impactful Than Vendor Choice</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/cisco-and-deloitte-wrong-good-practices-more-impactful-than-vendor-choice</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/cisco-and-deloitte-wrong-good-practices-more-impactful-than-vendor-choice#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 02:13:36 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Choice]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Deloitte]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Good]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Impactful]]></category> <category><![CDATA[More]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Practices]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Than]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Vendor]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Wrong]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/cisco-and-deloitte-wrong-good-practices-more-impactful-than-vendor-choice</guid> <description><![CDATA[Cisco is fighting back against the notion that a multi-vendor network can simplify operations and reduce TCO. The networking giant commissioned a report by Deloitte that finds operation costs will increase over the life of the equipment in a network that uses equipment from disparate vendors. The fact is, one vendor vs. multiple vendors is [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/cisco-and-deloitte-wrong-good-practices-more-impactful-than-vendor-choice/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>FCoE: Standards Don&#8217;t Matter; Vendor Choice Does</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/fcoe-standards-dont-matter-vendor-choice-does</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/fcoe-standards-dont-matter-vendor-choice-does#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 14:13:30 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Choice]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Don't]]></category> <category><![CDATA[FCoE]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Matter]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Vendor]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/fcoe-standards-dont-matter-vendor-choice-does</guid> <description><![CDATA[Over the last year or so, some FCoE experts have been arguing nuances of FCoE and which protocols you need or don&#8217;t need. FCoE inter-swich interoperability? I will be old(er) and gray(er) before that happens in any meaningful way. While they are interesting discussions&#8212;if you go for that sort of thing&#8212;ultimately, they won&#8217;t impact you&#8217;re [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/fcoe-standards-dont-matter-vendor-choice-does/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>