<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>IPHere &#187; CISPA</title> <atom:link href="https://www.iphere.com/tag/cispa/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>https://www.iphere.com</link> <description>We show your current IP</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 14:13:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en-US</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator> <item><title>Opinion: CISPA isn’t the evil, privacy-infringing legislation you think it is</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/opinion-cispa-isn%e2%80%99t-the-evil-privacy-infringing-legislation-you-think-it-is</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/opinion-cispa-isn%e2%80%99t-the-evil-privacy-infringing-legislation-you-think-it-is#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 08:16:52 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[CISPA]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Evil]]></category> <category><![CDATA[isn’t]]></category> <category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category> <category><![CDATA[privacyinfringing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Think]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/opinion-cispa-isn%e2%80%99t-the-evil-privacy-infringing-legislation-you-think-it-is</guid> <description><![CDATA[A bill that would foster stronger cyber security by enabling government and private sector companies to share information is facing opposition from privacy and civil liberties groups. The controversy is misguided, though, and the legislation is a step in the right direction. CISPA, or the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act, was introduced last year [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/opinion-cispa-isn%e2%80%99t-the-evil-privacy-infringing-legislation-you-think-it-is/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>CISPA Cybersecurity Bill, Reborn: 6 Key Facts</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/cispa-cybersecurity-bill-reborn-6-key-facts</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/cispa-cybersecurity-bill-reborn-6-key-facts#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 08:15:59 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Bill]]></category> <category><![CDATA[CISPA]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Facts]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Reborn]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/cispa-cybersecurity-bill-reborn-6-key-facts</guid> <description><![CDATA[Two members of the House Intelligence Committee Wednesday reintroduced their Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA), a controversial piece of cybersecurity legislation focused on information sharing. But does the bill stand any chance of succeeding, and in the wake of recent cybersecurity moves by the White House, is it even necessary? CISPA last year [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/cispa-cybersecurity-bill-reborn-6-key-facts/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>