<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>IPHere &#187; Climbing</title> <atom:link href="https://www.iphere.com/tag/climbing/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>https://www.iphere.com</link> <description>We show your current IP</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 14:13:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en-US</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator> <item><title>Chrome Inches Up, Firefox Flat, IE9 Climbing Fast</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/chrome-inches-up-firefox-flat-ie9-climbing-fast</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/chrome-inches-up-firefox-flat-ie9-climbing-fast#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 02:15:42 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Climbing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Fast]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Flat]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Inches]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/chrome-inches-up-firefox-flat-ie9-climbing-fast</guid> <description><![CDATA[The latest and greatest browser market share stats are out from Net Applications. On the surface, it seems there was very little change from last month among desktop browsers, but digging a little deeper yields some interesting perspective. Before we dive in, though, I want to point out a significant change this month in the [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/chrome-inches-up-firefox-flat-ie9-climbing-fast/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Scality: Climbing The Cloud Storage Heights</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/scality-climbing-the-cloud-storage-heights</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/scality-climbing-the-cloud-storage-heights#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2011 02:13:59 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Climbing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cloud]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Heights]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Scality]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/scality-climbing-the-cloud-storage-heights</guid> <description><![CDATA[The traditional storage business models of NAS and SAN have been worthwhile for many enterprises, but the question remains: Is NAS or SAN best for cloud computing environments? Scality, a storage vendor, asserts that, in many cases, the answer is no. Scality&#8217;s RING &#8220;organic storage software&#8221; is, according to the company, the first object-based storage [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/scality-climbing-the-cloud-storage-heights/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>