<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>IPHere &#187; Complicated</title> <atom:link href="https://www.iphere.com/tag/complicated/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>https://www.iphere.com</link> <description>We show your current IP</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 14:13:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en-US</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator> <item><title>VMware Does Complicated Dance With Open Source</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/vmware-does-complicated-dance-with-open-source</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/vmware-does-complicated-dance-with-open-source#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 20:13:16 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Complicated]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Dance]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Open]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Source]]></category> <category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/vmware-does-complicated-dance-with-open-source</guid> <description><![CDATA[When it comes to thinking about the future data center, it&#8217;s well understood that servers and storage will function as pools of virtualized resources that can automatically switch from task to task. Networking is a much harder nut to crack. It remains unvirtualized and has lagged far behind the other two. But without it, we&#8217;ll [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/vmware-does-complicated-dance-with-open-source/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>A Simple Question With A Complicated Answer: How Fast Should My WLAN Be?</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/a-simple-question-with-a-complicated-answer-how-fast-should-my-wlan-be</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/a-simple-question-with-a-complicated-answer-how-fast-should-my-wlan-be#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 14:13:38 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Answer]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Complicated]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Fast]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Question]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Should]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Simple]]></category> <category><![CDATA[WLAN]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/a-simple-question-with-a-complicated-answer-how-fast-should-my-wlan-be</guid> <description><![CDATA[Ethernet speeds are typically easy to discuss. Connection options jump between powers of 10, and range from 10 Mbps to 10 Gig (forget about 40 Gig for this discussion, it breaks my pattern). But the question &#8220;what kind of speed should I get on the wireless network?&#8221; is a whole different animal. To the uninitiated, [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/a-simple-question-with-a-complicated-answer-how-fast-should-my-wlan-be/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>