<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>IPHere &#187; Containerization</title> <atom:link href="https://www.iphere.com/tag/containerization/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>https://www.iphere.com</link> <description>We show your current IP</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 14:13:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en-US</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator> <item><title>Samsung? BlackBerry? Who Will Win the Containerization Wars?</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/samsung-blackberry-who-will-win-the-containerization-wars</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/samsung-blackberry-who-will-win-the-containerization-wars#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 14:13:49 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[BlackBerry]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Containerization]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Wars]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/samsung-blackberry-who-will-win-the-containerization-wars</guid> <description><![CDATA[MDM (mobile device management) has become a commodity technology over the years. It is also embarrassingly limited in its ability to secure devices and data on those devices. But it is, ironically, standardized by the rigid definition of what Apple will support. So when security companies like Apperian develop their MAM (mobile application management) solutions [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/samsung-blackberry-who-will-win-the-containerization-wars/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>