<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>IPHere &#187; Cybersecurity</title> <atom:link href="https://www.iphere.com/tag/cybersecurity/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>https://www.iphere.com</link> <description>We show your current IP</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 14:13:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en-US</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator> <item><title>Huawei Proposes Independent Cybersecurity Testing Labs</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/huawei-proposes-independent-cybersecurity-testing-labs</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/huawei-proposes-independent-cybersecurity-testing-labs#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2013 02:12:50 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Huawei]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Independent]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Labs]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Proposes]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Testing]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/huawei-proposes-independent-cybersecurity-testing-labs</guid> <description><![CDATA[The world needs independent testing labs that can review off-the-shelf IT products and rate their trustworthiness &#8212; not only on the performance front but also from an information security standpoint. That&#8217;s the pitch being advanced by $ 35 billion Chinese multinational networking and telecommunications equipment and services company Huawei. &#8220;Over the past couple of months [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/huawei-proposes-independent-cybersecurity-testing-labs/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>CISPA Cybersecurity Bill, Reborn: 6 Key Facts</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/cispa-cybersecurity-bill-reborn-6-key-facts</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/cispa-cybersecurity-bill-reborn-6-key-facts#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 08:15:59 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Bill]]></category> <category><![CDATA[CISPA]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Facts]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Reborn]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/cispa-cybersecurity-bill-reborn-6-key-facts</guid> <description><![CDATA[Two members of the House Intelligence Committee Wednesday reintroduced their Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA), a controversial piece of cybersecurity legislation focused on information sharing. But does the bill stand any chance of succeeding, and in the wake of recent cybersecurity moves by the White House, is it even necessary? CISPA last year [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/cispa-cybersecurity-bill-reborn-6-key-facts/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>