<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>IPHere &#187; Debate</title> <atom:link href="https://www.iphere.com/tag/debate/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>https://www.iphere.com</link> <description>We show your current IP</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 14:13:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en-US</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator> <item><title>Verizon challenge reignites net neutrality debate</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/verizon-challenge-reignites-net-neutrality-debate</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/verizon-challenge-reignites-net-neutrality-debate#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 20:12:44 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Challenge]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Debate]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Neutrality']]></category> <category><![CDATA[reignites]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/verizon-challenge-reignites-net-neutrality-debate</guid> <description><![CDATA[Net neutrality was all the rage a couple years ago as the FCC battled against Internet providers like AT&#38;T, Comcast, and Verizon to implement guidelines governing how Internet service is delivered. It hasn’t been making headlines for a while, but it’s back with a vengeance as Verizon gets its day in court to challenge the [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/verizon-challenge-reignites-net-neutrality-debate/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Intel, AMD Debate Best Chip For Cloud</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/intel-amd-debate-best-chip-for-cloud</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/intel-amd-debate-best-chip-for-cloud#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 22 Jun 2013 02:17:31 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Best]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Chip]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cloud]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Debate]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/intel-amd-debate-best-chip-for-cloud</guid> <description><![CDATA[Is the aging x86 instruction set the right one for the future? At the GigaOm Structure 2013 show Wednesday, proponents of different chip architectures staged the latest version of this ongoing debate. Structure is an eight-year old show meant to showcase the latest technologies and trends. AMD general manager Andrew Feldman said AMD has bet [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/intel-amd-debate-best-chip-for-cloud/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Cisco &amp; Friends Debate Cloud Future</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/cisco-friends-debate-cloud-future</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/cisco-friends-debate-cloud-future#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 02:13:44 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cloud]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Debate]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Friends]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Future]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/cisco-friends-debate-cloud-future</guid> <description><![CDATA[Cloud computing is evolving to the point where unique clouds will be developed for specific industry verticals such as health care, government or financial services, predicts a Cisco Systems executive speaking at the CloudConnect 2012 conference this week in Silicon Valley. This runs contrary to what some have called the Coke versus Pepsi rule, that [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/cisco-friends-debate-cloud-future/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Public Vs Private Cloud Debate Goes On</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/public-vs-private-cloud-debate-goes-on</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/public-vs-private-cloud-debate-goes-on#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 02:16:56 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cloud]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Debate]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Goes]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Private]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Public]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/public-vs-private-cloud-debate-goes-on</guid> <description><![CDATA[While there are important differences between a public cloud and a private cloud computing environment, industry leaders say the pros and cons of each aren&#8217;t as significant as the fact that both options are available for businesses and enterprises. At the recent CloudBeat 2011 conference in Redwood City, Calif., executives of various companies delivering cloud [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/public-vs-private-cloud-debate-goes-on/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>The Great Storage Protocol Debate</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/the-great-storage-protocol-debate</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/the-great-storage-protocol-debate#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 14:13:14 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Debate]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Great]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Protocol]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/the-great-storage-protocol-debate</guid> <description><![CDATA[As the Great Debate: iSCSI Beats Fibre Channel session I&#8217;m moderating at Interop NY next month will demonstrate, passions run high when you get storage and server administrators talking about their favorite storage protocols. While the iSCSI vs Fibre Channel debate gets the most attention, the even older battle between file and block protocols is [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/the-great-storage-protocol-debate/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Google+, Day 5: The &#8220;Real Names&#8221; Debate</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/google-day-5-the-real-names-debate</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/google-day-5-the-real-names-debate#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2011 20:13:31 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA['Real]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Debate]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Google]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Names]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/google-day-5-the-real-names-debate</guid> <description><![CDATA[30 Days With Google+: Day 5 Google ruffled feathers when it simply shut down thousands of Google+ accounts citing a policy that you must use your real name for your Google+ profile. Google since backed off a little on how aggressive it is with enforcement, but the policy itself sparked an online debate about the [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/google-day-5-the-real-names-debate/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>