<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>IPHere &#187; Fallacies</title> <atom:link href="https://www.iphere.com/tag/fallacies/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>https://www.iphere.com</link> <description>We show your current IP</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 14:13:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en-US</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator> <item><title>NIST Security Standards: Fallacies And Pitfalls</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/nist-security-standards-fallacies-and-pitfalls</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/nist-security-standards-fallacies-and-pitfalls#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2013 14:12:47 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Fallacies]]></category> <category><![CDATA[NIST]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Pitfalls]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/nist-security-standards-fallacies-and-pitfalls</guid> <description><![CDATA[Given the rise of cybercrime over the last few years, few would argue that the federal government is doing enough to address the risks, although the National Institute of Standards and Technology has been trying. Earlier this year, NIST developed Revision 4 of its 800-53 standard that aims to set a higher standard of security [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/nist-security-standards-fallacies-and-pitfalls/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>4 IPv6 Security Fallacies</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/4-ipv6-security-fallacies</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/4-ipv6-security-fallacies#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2013 02:13:23 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Fallacies]]></category> <category><![CDATA[IPv6]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/4-ipv6-security-fallacies</guid> <description><![CDATA[As IPv6 continues to gain traction, some misconceptions around its perceived security&#8211;or lack thereof&#8211;persist. Security experts provide a reality check. Network Computing]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/4-ipv6-security-fallacies/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>