<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>IPHere &#187; Fear</title> <atom:link href="https://www.iphere.com/tag/fear/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>https://www.iphere.com</link> <description>We show your current IP</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 14:13:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en-US</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator> <item><title>Monitoring Where Search Engines Fear To Tread</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/monitoring-where-search-engines-fear-to-tread</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/monitoring-where-search-engines-fear-to-tread#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2013 14:18:25 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Engines]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Fear]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Monitoring]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Search]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Tread]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/monitoring-where-search-engines-fear-to-tread</guid> <description><![CDATA[The Tor Onion Routing network has long been a favorite way for privacy-seeking online users to add a series of anonymizing layers between themselves and sites on the Internet. From hackers and dissidents to companies and governments seeking to cloak their activities online, Tor has gained a significant following of users. Yet anonymizing networks, or [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/monitoring-where-search-engines-fear-to-tread/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Feds Greatest Security Fear? Hacktivists!</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/feds-greatest-security-fear-hacktivists</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/feds-greatest-security-fear-hacktivists#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 20:14:19 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Fear]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Feds']]></category> <category><![CDATA[Greatest]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Hacktivists]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/feds-greatest-security-fear-hacktivists</guid> <description><![CDATA[Potential cyberthreats from foreign governments play second fiddle to concerns over hacktivists and the insider threat, report finds. BYOD and mobility second only to social media, are the biggest vulnerabilities. Network Computing]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/feds-greatest-security-fear-hacktivists/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>The Tape Format Rot Fear Factor</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/the-tape-format-rot-fear-factor</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/the-tape-format-rot-fear-factor#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 14:14:29 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Factor]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Fear]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Format]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Tape]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/the-tape-format-rot-fear-factor</guid> <description><![CDATA[As I speak with users at the backup seminars I teach around the country, I often hear them say that they avoid using tape for long-term data retention, expressing their concern with something like, &#8220;They come out with a new format every few years, and then you can&#8217;t read your tapes.&#8221; While it is technically [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/the-tape-format-rot-fear-factor/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>The Fear And Loathing Of /64s On Point-To-Point Links</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/the-fear-and-loathing-of-64s-on-point-to-point-links</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/the-fear-and-loathing-of-64s-on-point-to-point-links#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 14:13:08 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[/64s]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Fear]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Links]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Loathing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[PointToPoint]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/the-fear-and-loathing-of-64s-on-point-to-point-links</guid> <description><![CDATA[I discussed in a previous article the necessity of abandoning IPv4 thinking when creating IPv6 address designs, and how our deeply ingrained need to conserve addresses can muddle our thinking. Nowhere does this conservative aversion to address waste snarl at us as menacingly as when we consider &#8211; completely compliant with the recommendations of ARIN [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/the-fear-and-loathing-of-64s-on-point-to-point-links/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>