<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>IPHere &#187; FortiGate</title> <atom:link href="https://www.iphere.com/tag/fortigate/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>https://www.iphere.com</link> <description>We show your current IP</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 14:13:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en-US</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator> <item><title>FortiGate 3700D: high performance firewall at low cost</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/fortigate-3700d-high-performance-firewall-at-low-cost</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/fortigate-3700d-high-performance-firewall-at-low-cost#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2013 20:13:35 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[3700D]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cost]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Firewall]]></category> <category><![CDATA[FortiGate]]></category> <category><![CDATA[High]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/fortigate-3700d-high-performance-firewall-at-low-cost</guid> <description><![CDATA[Quality, speed, or price—pick two. This is a common axiom applied to a variety of business issues, and it is generally true that you have to sacrifice one in order to have the others. Fortinet believes it may be able to deliver all three at the same time, though, with the launch of the new [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/fortigate-3700d-high-performance-firewall-at-low-cost/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>