<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>IPHere &#187; Governments</title> <atom:link href="https://www.iphere.com/tag/governments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>https://www.iphere.com</link> <description>We show your current IP</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 14:13:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en-US</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator> <item><title>Governments Missing Out On Virtualization Savings</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/governments-missing-out-on-virtualization-savings</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/governments-missing-out-on-virtualization-savings#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 02:14:56 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Governments]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Missing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Savings]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/governments-missing-out-on-virtualization-savings</guid> <description><![CDATA[Government agencies need to overcome funding uncertainties and other major barriers in order to realize savings from virtualizing their servers and desktops, according to a new study by MeriTalk. The report, &#8220;Virtualization Vacuum: The 2012 Government Virtualization Study,&#8221; surveyed government IT decision makers. One of the key findings is that 82 percent of federal and [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/governments-missing-out-on-virtualization-savings/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>