<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>IPHere &#187; Initiators</title> <atom:link href="https://www.iphere.com/tag/initiators/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>https://www.iphere.com</link> <description>We show your current IP</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 14:13:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en-US</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator> <item><title>OpenFCoE: Will Software Initiators Win Again?</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/openfcoe-will-software-initiators-win-again</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/openfcoe-will-software-initiators-win-again#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 17:15:10 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Again]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Initiators]]></category> <category><![CDATA[OpenFCoE]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Software]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/openfcoe-will-software-initiators-win-again</guid> <description><![CDATA[Now that second and, for some components, third generation FCoE equipment is coming to market, Intel is once again promoting the use of OpenFCoE software initiators with their X520 10Gbps network cards as an alternative to CNAs that process the FCoE protocol traffic on-card. The question for OpenFCoE is will the FCoE market develop like [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/openfcoe-will-software-initiators-win-again/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>