<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>IPHere &#187; LISP</title> <atom:link href="https://www.iphere.com/tag/lisp/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>https://www.iphere.com</link> <description>We show your current IP</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 14:13:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en-US</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator> <item><title>IPv6 Transition: Cisco LISP Vs. Tunnel Services</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/ipv6-transition-cisco-lisp-vs-tunnel-services</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/ipv6-transition-cisco-lisp-vs-tunnel-services#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 20:12:59 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category> <category><![CDATA[IPv6]]></category> <category><![CDATA[LISP]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Services]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Transition]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Tunnel]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/ipv6-transition-cisco-lisp-vs-tunnel-services</guid> <description><![CDATA[Cisco says its LISP protocol is an ideal transition tool for IPv6, but tunnel broker services require less configuration and can be easily removed once native IPv6 support is in place. Network Computing]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/ipv6-transition-cisco-lisp-vs-tunnel-services/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Using Cisco&#8217;s OTV and LISP to Improve Application Availability</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/using-ciscos-otv-and-lisp-to-improve-application-availability</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/using-ciscos-otv-and-lisp-to-improve-application-availability#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 20:13:04 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Application]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Availability]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cisco's]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Improve]]></category> <category><![CDATA[LISP]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Using]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/using-ciscos-otv-and-lisp-to-improve-application-availability</guid> <description><![CDATA[Data center and server failures can lead to high-profile service outages. Two Cisco protocols&#8211; OTV and LISP&#8211;seek to minimize the effect of failures. Network Computing]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/using-ciscos-otv-and-lisp-to-improve-application-availability/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>