<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>IPHere &#187; Mirror</title> <atom:link href="https://www.iphere.com/tag/mirror/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>https://www.iphere.com</link> <description>We show your current IP</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 14:13:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en-US</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator> <item><title>HP Says It&#8217;s Getting Larger In Cisco&#8217;s Rear-View Mirror</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/hp-says-its-getting-larger-in-ciscos-rear-view-mirror</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/hp-says-its-getting-larger-in-ciscos-rear-view-mirror#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 20:15:00 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cisco's]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Getting]]></category> <category><![CDATA[It's]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Larger]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Mirror]]></category> <category><![CDATA[RearView]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Says]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/hp-says-its-getting-larger-in-ciscos-rear-view-mirror</guid> <description><![CDATA[HP is responding to a Cisco Systems study, which said that HP&#8217;s networking equipment is not as cheap as HP claims, by sharing industry figures that show HP&#8217;s message is resonating with Cisco customers, a third of which are reportedly switching to HP. At the same time, soon-to-be-published survey results from Information Week show that, [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/hp-says-its-getting-larger-in-ciscos-rear-view-mirror/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Why Not Mirror In The Volume Manager?</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/why-not-mirror-in-the-volume-manager</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/why-not-mirror-in-the-volume-manager#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 16:34:01 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Manager]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Mirror]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Volume]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/why-not-mirror-in-the-volume-manager</guid> <description><![CDATA[As I talk to users and vendors about their data protection schemes, I&#8217;ve noticed that many organizations protect their mission-critical applications by synchronously mirroring data from a primary array to a secondary array. They then replicate from the secondary array off-site, or off-campus, asynchronously to a third target. As I think about this architecture, I&#8217;ve [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/why-not-mirror-in-the-volume-manager/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>