<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>IPHere &#187; Neutrality&#8217;</title> <atom:link href="https://www.iphere.com/tag/neutrality/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>https://www.iphere.com</link> <description>We show your current IP</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 14:13:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en-US</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator> <item><title>FCC puts first nail in the coffin of net neutrality</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/fcc-puts-first-nail-in-the-coffin-of-net-neutrality</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/fcc-puts-first-nail-in-the-coffin-of-net-neutrality#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2014 20:13:38 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[coffin]]></category> <category><![CDATA[first]]></category> <category><![CDATA[nail]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Neutrality']]></category> <category><![CDATA[Puts]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/fcc-puts-first-nail-in-the-coffin-of-net-neutrality</guid> <description><![CDATA[The FCC has voted to start the formal process of establishing new “Net Neutrality” rules. More accurately, the FCC has begun the process of killing the concept of net neutrality in favor of a system that lets broadband providers make money from both sides and charge companies for faster, priority delivery of Internet content. Tom [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/fcc-puts-first-nail-in-the-coffin-of-net-neutrality/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Verizon challenge reignites net neutrality debate</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/verizon-challenge-reignites-net-neutrality-debate</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/verizon-challenge-reignites-net-neutrality-debate#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 20:12:44 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Challenge]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Debate]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Neutrality']]></category> <category><![CDATA[reignites]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/verizon-challenge-reignites-net-neutrality-debate</guid> <description><![CDATA[Net neutrality was all the rage a couple years ago as the FCC battled against Internet providers like AT&#38;T, Comcast, and Verizon to implement guidelines governing how Internet service is delivered. It hasn’t been making headlines for a while, but it’s back with a vengeance as Verizon gets its day in court to challenge the [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/verizon-challenge-reignites-net-neutrality-debate/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Verizon Playing Dangerous Game in Net Neutrality Battle</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/verizon-playing-dangerous-game-in-net-neutrality-battle</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/verizon-playing-dangerous-game-in-net-neutrality-battle#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 14:15:01 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Battle]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Dangerous]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Game]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Neutrality']]></category> <category><![CDATA[Playing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/verizon-playing-dangerous-game-in-net-neutrality-battle</guid> <description><![CDATA[It’s been awhile since net neutrality has been in the headlines, but that doesn’t mean the war is over&#8211;far from it. In it’s renewed challenge to the net neutrality rules imposed by the FCC, Verizon is citing its First Amendment right to free speech. The argument itself seems dubious, but if Verizon wins it could [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/verizon-playing-dangerous-game-in-net-neutrality-battle/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Think Net Neutrality Will Kill Innovation And Jobs? Think Again</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/think-net-neutrality-will-kill-innovation-and-jobs-think-again</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/think-net-neutrality-will-kill-innovation-and-jobs-think-again#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 08:37:27 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Again]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Kill]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Neutrality']]></category> <category><![CDATA[Think]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/think-net-neutrality-will-kill-innovation-and-jobs-think-again</guid> <description><![CDATA[I simply do not understand how Net neutrality detractors think that the proposed rules the FCC wants to put into place could hurt innovation. Even a cursory read of the rules shows that they are trying to set a level playing field, ensuring that those who control the last mile cannot arbitrarily limit or restrict [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/think-net-neutrality-will-kill-innovation-and-jobs-think-again/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>FCC Focuses On Waxman &#8216;Net Neutrality&#8217; Framework</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/fcc-focuses-on-waxman-net-neutrality-framework</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/fcc-focuses-on-waxman-net-neutrality-framework#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 00:34:55 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA['Net]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Focuses]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Framework]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Neutrality']]></category> <category><![CDATA[Waxman]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/fcc-focuses-on-waxman-net-neutrality-framework</guid> <description><![CDATA[With the Federal Communications Commission&#8217;s announcement that it will review net neutrality on Dec. 21, the real devil will be in the details: What framework will be voted on by the commissioners, who are already divided, perhaps irretrievably? The focus then is on &#8220;the framework&#8221; developed by Democratic Congressman Henry Waxman of California, who is [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/fcc-focuses-on-waxman-net-neutrality-framework/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>