<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>IPHere &#187; Patents</title> <atom:link href="https://www.iphere.com/tag/patents/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>https://www.iphere.com</link> <description>We show your current IP</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 14:13:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en-US</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator> <item><title>Apple v. Samsung Highlights Insanity of Tech Patents</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/apple-v-samsung-highlights-insanity-of-tech-patents</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/apple-v-samsung-highlights-insanity-of-tech-patents#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 08:17:07 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Highlights]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Insanity]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/apple-v-samsung-highlights-insanity-of-tech-patents</guid> <description><![CDATA[Patent litigation has become standard business practice in the tech world, and no rivalry demonstrates that better than Apple and Samsung. The ongoing trial between the two smartphone and tablet leaders is the poster child for all that is wrong with tech patents. Trolling v. Decency &#8230; Net Work]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/apple-v-samsung-highlights-insanity-of-tech-patents/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>AOL Patents: What&#8217;s in It for Microsoft?</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/aol-patents-whats-in-it-for-microsoft</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/aol-patents-whats-in-it-for-microsoft#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 02:13:38 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category> <category><![CDATA[What's]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/aol-patents-whats-in-it-for-microsoft</guid> <description><![CDATA[AOL announced that it has closed a deal to sell more than 800 patents to Microsoft. The deal is just north of a billion dollars, and it’s easy to see why AOL might want to cash in on the intellectual property. What is less clear is why Microsoft is interested in the patent portfolio, or [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/aol-patents-whats-in-it-for-microsoft/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>