<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>IPHere &#187; Pricing</title> <atom:link href="https://www.iphere.com/tag/pricing/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>https://www.iphere.com</link> <description>We show your current IP</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 14:13:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en-US</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator> <item><title>VMware Mum On NSX Pricing, Touts License Plan</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/vmware-mum-on-nsx-pricing-touts-license-plan</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/vmware-mum-on-nsx-pricing-touts-license-plan#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2013 08:12:47 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[License]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Plan]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Pricing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Touts]]></category> <category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/vmware-mum-on-nsx-pricing-touts-license-plan</guid> <description><![CDATA[VMware has announced the general availability of its NSX network virtualization software and its licensing scheme, but the company was silent on actual prices. Network Computing]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/vmware-mum-on-nsx-pricing-touts-license-plan/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Microsoft continues to miss the point with Surface pricing</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/microsoft-continues-to-miss-the-point-with-surface-pricing</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/microsoft-continues-to-miss-the-point-with-surface-pricing#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2013 14:12:53 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Continues]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Miss]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Point]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Pricing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Surface]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/microsoft-continues-to-miss-the-point-with-surface-pricing</guid> <description><![CDATA[Microsoft got out the axe again, and cut the price of some Surface Pro models by $ 100. While the move may help boost the anemic sales of Microsoft’s tablets, it’s not significant enough to make a real impact—especially for business users. It’s being framed as a sort of “back-to-school” promotion, following closely on the [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/microsoft-continues-to-miss-the-point-with-surface-pricing/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>New Cloud Backup Pricing Targets Recovery</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/new-cloud-backup-pricing-targets-recovery</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/new-cloud-backup-pricing-targets-recovery#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 20:13:48 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[backup]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cloud]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Pricing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Recovery]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Targets]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/new-cloud-backup-pricing-targets-recovery</guid> <description><![CDATA[Cloud backup pioneer Asigra announced a new pricing model based on data restoration. Meanwhile, EMC announced slew of updates to its enterprise backup portfolio. Network Computing]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/new-cloud-backup-pricing-targets-recovery/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>DIY Storage Part 3: Pricing Pitfalls</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/diy-storage-part-3-pricing-pitfalls</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/diy-storage-part-3-pricing-pitfalls#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 14:15:25 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Part]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Pitfalls]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Pricing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/diy-storage-part-3-pricing-pitfalls</guid> <description><![CDATA[In building my own SAN as a pilot project at work, I learned firsthand about how vendors can make it difficult to budget creatively. Here are some of the roadblocks I ran into (and workarounds to avoid them) when trying to reduce storage costs. Network Computing]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/diy-storage-part-3-pricing-pitfalls/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>IT Vendors Need More Pricing Transparency</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/it-vendors-need-more-pricing-transparency</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/it-vendors-need-more-pricing-transparency#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 02:15:08 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[More]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Need]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Pricing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Transparency]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Vendors]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/it-vendors-need-more-pricing-transparency</guid> <description><![CDATA[Compiling our SDN product comparison provided a vivid lesson in the difficulty of getting meaningful prices for enterprise IT equipment. Network Computing]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/it-vendors-need-more-pricing-transparency/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Microsoft Surface RT pricing walks a risky line</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/microsoft-surface-rt-pricing-walks-a-risky-line</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/microsoft-surface-rt-pricing-walks-a-risky-line#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 02:13:39 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Line]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Pricing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[risky]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Surface]]></category> <category><![CDATA[walks]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/microsoft-surface-rt-pricing-walks-a-risky-line</guid> <description><![CDATA[It’s not the pricing I had hoped for. But, at the same time the price options for the Surface RT tablet are not ridiculous. The pricing of the Surface RT tablet is competitive—not high enough to be dead on arrival, and not low enough to be a slam dunk. According to details available on the [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/microsoft-surface-rt-pricing-walks-a-risky-line/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Will VM Pricing Topple VMware Juggernaut?</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/will-vm-pricing-topple-vmware-juggernaut</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/will-vm-pricing-topple-vmware-juggernaut#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 08:16:42 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Juggernaut]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Pricing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Topple]]></category> <category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/will-vm-pricing-topple-vmware-juggernaut</guid> <description><![CDATA[The virtualization market continues to heat up, exceeding expectations across the board for servers, desktops and appliances. However, will licensing and pricing concerns, along with competition derail the growth of industry giant VMware? Network Computing]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/will-vm-pricing-topple-vmware-juggernaut/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Why Apple&#8217;s eBook Pricing Defense Is Wrong</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/why-apples-ebook-pricing-defense-is-wrong</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/why-apples-ebook-pricing-defense-is-wrong#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 20:13:57 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Apple's]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category> <category><![CDATA[eBook]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Pricing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Wrong]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/why-apples-ebook-pricing-defense-is-wrong</guid> <description><![CDATA[Last week the U.S. Department of Justice filed an antitrust suit against Apple and five publishers for alleged price fixing of ebooks. Apple fired back, claiming that it’s the hero in this equation, not the villain&#8211;just doing its part to break the monopoly hold Amazon held over the publishing industry. As an author, and a [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/why-apples-ebook-pricing-defense-is-wrong/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Blue Jeans&#8217; New Pricing Dubbed An &#8216;MCU Killer&#8217;</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/blue-jeans-new-pricing-dubbed-an-mcu-killer</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/blue-jeans-new-pricing-dubbed-an-mcu-killer#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 08:14:24 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[&#8216MCU]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Blue]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Dubbed]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Jeans&#8217]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Killer&#8217]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Pricing]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/blue-jeans-new-pricing-dubbed-an-mcu-killer</guid> <description><![CDATA[Blue Jeans Network, which offers videoconferencing in the cloud, has introduced a new pricing model targeted as a direct broadside to expensive systems from vendors such as Cisco Systems and Polycom. It will now offer its service at a rate of $ 299 per port, per month, which should be dramatically less expensive that those [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/blue-jeans-new-pricing-dubbed-an-mcu-killer/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>IT Buyers Seek Flexible Pricing</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/it-buyers-seek-flexible-pricing</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/it-buyers-seek-flexible-pricing#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:14:32 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Buyers]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Flexible]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Pricing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Seek]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/it-buyers-seek-flexible-pricing</guid> <description><![CDATA[Capital spending by businesses took a beating during the recent recession, but IT spending held up pretty well by comparison. Still, as the economy slowly recovers from the downturn, businesses are keeping tight control of their capital budgets and are looking for flexible pricing on IT products and services, industry analysts say. Network Computing]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/it-buyers-seek-flexible-pricing/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>