<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>IPHere &#187; Proper</title> <atom:link href="https://www.iphere.com/tag/proper/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>https://www.iphere.com</link> <description>We show your current IP</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 14:13:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en-US</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator> <item><title>IPv6: Proper Planning Prevents Poor Performance</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/ipv6-proper-planning-prevents-poor-performance</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/ipv6-proper-planning-prevents-poor-performance#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 20:14:22 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[IPv6]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Planning]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Poor]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Prevents]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Proper]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/ipv6-proper-planning-prevents-poor-performance</guid> <description><![CDATA[IPv6 is coming, as we&#8217;ve reported in this series on some of the issues network operators have to deal with in the near future. Two issues that require more than just checking boxes on a to-do list concern compliance and security. However, making sure the IPv6 network is as compliant and secure as the existing [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/ipv6-proper-planning-prevents-poor-performance/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Commvault Turns Snapshots Into &#8220;Proper&#8221; Backups</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/commvault-turns-snapshots-into-proper-backups</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/commvault-turns-snapshots-into-proper-backups#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 00:35:00 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Backups]]></category> <category><![CDATA[CommVault]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Into]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Proper]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Snapshots]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Turns]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/commvault-turns-snapshots-into-proper-backups</guid> <description><![CDATA[As we discussed a few weeks ago you can certainly argue that snapshots, when combined with replication, could serve as an adequate backup system. My biggest objection was that snapshots lack the catalog that conventional backup applications build as they backup data. Commvault&#8217;s SnapProtect fills that gap providing catalogs and a management console for snapshots [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/commvault-turns-snapshots-into-proper-backups/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>