<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>IPHere &#187; Really</title> <atom:link href="https://www.iphere.com/tag/really/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>https://www.iphere.com</link> <description>We show your current IP</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 14:13:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en-US</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator> <item><title>HP report: 80 percent of app vulnerabilities are really your fault</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/hp-report-80-percent-of-app-vulnerabilities-are-really-your-fault</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/hp-report-80-percent-of-app-vulnerabilities-are-really-your-fault#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2014 02:13:51 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Fault]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Percent]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Really]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Report]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Vulnerabilities]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/hp-report-80-percent-of-app-vulnerabilities-are-really-your-fault</guid> <description><![CDATA[Let&#8217;s be clear: There is no such thing as an invulnerable application. Some have more critical vulnerabilities than others as we discovered this week with the Heartbleed bug, but any application can be exploited given a dedicated attacker. According to the HP 2013 Cyber Risk Report, though, the application itself is not to blame for [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/hp-report-80-percent-of-app-vulnerabilities-are-really-your-fault/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Who Is Really Pushing NFV?</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/who-is-really-pushing-nfv</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/who-is-really-pushing-nfv#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2013 08:15:52 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Pushing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Really]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/who-is-really-pushing-nfv</guid> <description><![CDATA[Network Function Virtualization (NFV) turns hardware appliances into virtualized services. As NFV interest grows, who stands to gain the most benefit? Network Computing]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/who-is-really-pushing-nfv/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>There&#8217;s really no such thing as a &#8216;best&#8217; mobile provider</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/theres-really-no-such-thing-as-a-best-mobile-provider</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/theres-really-no-such-thing-as-a-best-mobile-provider#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 02:13:16 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Best]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Provider]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Really]]></category> <category><![CDATA[such]]></category> <category><![CDATA[There's]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Thing]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/theres-really-no-such-thing-as-a-best-mobile-provider</guid> <description><![CDATA[As with all things tech, there are rabidly loyal fans of each of the four major mobile network providers, and strong opinions on all sides about which is the “best.” While Verizon, AT&#38;T, Sprint, and T-Mobile each have their pros and cons, it’s virtually impossible to declare one the winner. Late last month, PCWorld&#8216;s sister [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/theres-really-no-such-thing-as-a-best-mobile-provider/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>What Office 2013&#8242;s draconian licensing policy really means for you</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/what-office-2013s-draconian-licensing-policy-really-means-for-you-2</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/what-office-2013s-draconian-licensing-policy-really-means-for-you-2#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 14:13:49 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA['Office]]></category> <category><![CDATA[2013's]]></category> <category><![CDATA[draconian]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Licensing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Means]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Really]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/what-office-2013s-draconian-licensing-policy-really-means-for-you-2</guid> <description><![CDATA[Microsoft might be selling two versions of its Office suite, but its licensing policies suggest the company is not only trying to thwart software piracy, but also drive customers away from Office 2013 and over to the Office 365 subscription model.  First, a little background. Purchasing Office 2013 only provides a license for a single PC [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/what-office-2013s-draconian-licensing-policy-really-means-for-you-2/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>BYOD Security: Do You Really Need MDM?</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/byod-security-do-you-really-need-mdm</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/byod-security-do-you-really-need-mdm#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 02:13:50 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[BYOD]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Need]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Really]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/byod-security-do-you-really-need-mdm</guid> <description><![CDATA[IT is being stampeded into adopting MDM to protect mobile devices. But it&#8217;s not a silver bullet, and it may be overkill for many needs where conventional wireless network security best practices will suffice. Network Computing]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/byod-security-do-you-really-need-mdm/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>What Office 2013&#8242;s draconian licensing policy really means for you</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/what-office-2013s-draconian-licensing-policy-really-means-for-you</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/what-office-2013s-draconian-licensing-policy-really-means-for-you#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 02:19:02 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA['Office]]></category> <category><![CDATA[2013's]]></category> <category><![CDATA[draconian]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Licensing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Means]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Really]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/what-office-2013s-draconian-licensing-policy-really-means-for-you</guid> <description><![CDATA[Microsoft might be selling two versions of its Office suite, but its licensing policies suggest the company is not only trying to thwart software piracy, but also drive customers away from Office 2013 and over to the Office 365 subscription model.  First, a little background. Purchasing Office 2013 only provides a license for a single PC [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/what-office-2013s-draconian-licensing-policy-really-means-for-you/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Does Microsoft Really Need To Make Its Own Hardware?</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/does-microsoft-really-need-to-make-its-own-hardware</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/does-microsoft-really-need-to-make-its-own-hardware#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 02:13:40 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Need]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Really]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/does-microsoft-really-need-to-make-its-own-hardware</guid> <description><![CDATA[Steve Ballmer says Microsoft is seriously considering making more of its own hardware. It seems that even with the old guard of IBM, Dell, Toshiba, Sony and HP, and the new guard of Samsung, Lenovo, LG and Asus, and all those white-box manufacturers, Microsoft just can&#8217;t find a reliable design partner. Have we come full [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/does-microsoft-really-need-to-make-its-own-hardware/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>The one thing Windows 8 desktops really need</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/the-one-thing-windows-8-desktops-really-need</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/the-one-thing-windows-8-desktops-really-need#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 20:14:17 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Desktops]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Need]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Really]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Thing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/the-one-thing-windows-8-desktops-really-need</guid> <description><![CDATA[With the official launch of Windows 8 on the imminent horizon, PC manufacturers have announced a diverse array of new hardware. The problem with all of the desktop options is that they lack the one peripheral device they need to work effectively with Windows 8: a touchpad. Just to catch everyone up, Windows 8 is [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/the-one-thing-windows-8-desktops-really-need/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>The only thing the iPhone 5 really needs</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/the-only-thing-the-iphone-5-really-needs</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/the-only-thing-the-iphone-5-really-needs#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2012 08:13:08 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Needs]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Only]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Really]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Thing]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/the-only-thing-the-iphone-5-really-needs</guid> <description><![CDATA[The iPhone 5 is coming! The iPhone 5 is coming! In case you’ve been in a coma the last day or two, Apple has sent out invites to the media for an event next week, which is all but guaranteed to be the official unveiling of the highly anticipated iPhone 5. As with any new [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/the-only-thing-the-iphone-5-really-needs/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Dell Buys Wyse to Continue Evolution to &#8216;Not Really a PC Company&#8217;</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/dell-buys-wyse-to-continue-evolution-to-not-really-a-pc-company</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/dell-buys-wyse-to-continue-evolution-to-not-really-a-pc-company#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 20:20:30 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA['Not]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Buys]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Company]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Continue]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Really]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Wyse]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/dell-buys-wyse-to-continue-evolution-to-not-really-a-pc-company</guid> <description><![CDATA[Last month Michael Dell let the world know that Dell is “not really a PC company.” Today, Dell announced that it has reached an agreement with Wyse that extends Dell’s portfolio of products and services even further beyond the traditional PC market. Wyse is an established player in the thin client market. The addition of [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/dell-buys-wyse-to-continue-evolution-to-not-really-a-pc-company/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>