<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>IPHere &#187; Reborn</title> <atom:link href="https://www.iphere.com/tag/reborn/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>https://www.iphere.com</link> <description>We show your current IP</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 14:13:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en-US</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator> <item><title>CISPA Cybersecurity Bill, Reborn: 6 Key Facts</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/cispa-cybersecurity-bill-reborn-6-key-facts</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/cispa-cybersecurity-bill-reborn-6-key-facts#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 08:15:59 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Bill]]></category> <category><![CDATA[CISPA]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Facts]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Reborn]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/cispa-cybersecurity-bill-reborn-6-key-facts</guid> <description><![CDATA[Two members of the House Intelligence Committee Wednesday reintroduced their Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA), a controversial piece of cybersecurity legislation focused on information sharing. But does the bill stand any chance of succeeding, and in the wake of recent cybersecurity moves by the White House, is it even necessary? CISPA last year [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/cispa-cybersecurity-bill-reborn-6-key-facts/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Prediction: OpenFlow Is Dead by 2014; SDN Reborn in Network Management</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/prediction-openflow-is-dead-by-2014-sdn-reborn-in-network-management</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/prediction-openflow-is-dead-by-2014-sdn-reborn-in-network-management#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 08:15:21 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[2014]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Dead]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Management]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Network]]></category> <category><![CDATA[OpenFlow]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Prediction]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Reborn]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/prediction-openflow-is-dead-by-2014-sdn-reborn-in-network-management</guid> <description><![CDATA[OpenFlow and software-defined networking were on the agenda at Interop yesterday. But will they stand the test of time, or will SDN eventually become part of network management? Network Computing]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/prediction-openflow-is-dead-by-2014-sdn-reborn-in-network-management/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>