<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>IPHere &#187; Relationship</title> <atom:link href="https://www.iphere.com/tag/relationship/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>https://www.iphere.com</link> <description>We show your current IP</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 14:13:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en-US</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator> <item><title>More on Performance Metrics: The Relationship Between IOPS and Latency</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/more-on-performance-metrics-the-relationship-between-iops-and-latency</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/more-on-performance-metrics-the-relationship-between-iops-and-latency#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 02:12:57 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Between]]></category> <category><![CDATA[IOPS]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Latency]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Metrics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[More]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Relationship]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/more-on-performance-metrics-the-relationship-between-iops-and-latency</guid> <description><![CDATA[The best predictors of storage-related application performance have always been latency and IOPS. Hybrid SSD and HD systems are changing how those numbers should be viewed. Network Computing]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/more-on-performance-metrics-the-relationship-between-iops-and-latency/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Cisco VDI Blitz Includes Tighter Citrix Relationship</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/cisco-vdi-blitz-includes-tighter-citrix-relationship</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/cisco-vdi-blitz-includes-tighter-citrix-relationship#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 14:15:47 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Blitz]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Includes]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Relationship]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Tighter]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/cisco-vdi-blitz-includes-tighter-citrix-relationship</guid> <description><![CDATA[Cisco is looking to carve a bigger slice out of the desktop virtualization market with new products, services and an expanded relationship with VDI powerhouse Citrix Systems. The networking company says that hundreds of customers have rolled out Citrix XenDesktop and VMware View deployments based on Cisco data center solutions. Network Computing]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/cisco-vdi-blitz-includes-tighter-citrix-relationship/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Dell&#8217;s Compellent Deal Should Hurt, Not Kill, EMC Relationship</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/dells-compellent-deal-should-hurt-not-kill-emc-relationship</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/dells-compellent-deal-should-hurt-not-kill-emc-relationship#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2010 00:52:17 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Compellent]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Deal]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Dell's]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Hurt]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Kill]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Relationship]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Should]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/dells-compellent-deal-should-hurt-not-kill-emc-relationship</guid> <description><![CDATA[Dell&#8217;s proposed acquisition of Compellent Technologies should mean that the EMC Clariion relationship, which took a big hit with Dell&#8217;s acquisition of EqualLogic and suffered another body blow when Dell lost out to Hewlett-Packard in the 3Par bidding war, is pretty much over. Dell is seeking to acquire all outstanding common stock of Compellent for [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/dells-compellent-deal-should-hurt-not-kill-emc-relationship/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>