<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>IPHere &#187; Samsung</title> <atom:link href="https://www.iphere.com/tag/samsung/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>https://www.iphere.com</link> <description>We show your current IP</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 14:13:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en-US</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator> <item><title>Centrify Integrates Samsung Knox Into MDM Platform</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/centrify-integrates-samsung-knox-into-mdm-platform</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/centrify-integrates-samsung-knox-into-mdm-platform#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2013 14:17:34 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Centrify]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Integrates]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Into]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Knox]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Platform]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/centrify-integrates-samsung-knox-into-mdm-platform</guid> <description><![CDATA[Company takes mobile device management to another level by combining Knox security for Android with its Active Directory-centric approach. Network Computing]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/centrify-integrates-samsung-knox-into-mdm-platform/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Samsung? BlackBerry? Who Will Win the Containerization Wars?</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/samsung-blackberry-who-will-win-the-containerization-wars</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/samsung-blackberry-who-will-win-the-containerization-wars#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 14:13:49 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[BlackBerry]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Containerization]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Wars]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/samsung-blackberry-who-will-win-the-containerization-wars</guid> <description><![CDATA[MDM (mobile device management) has become a commodity technology over the years. It is also embarrassingly limited in its ability to secure devices and data on those devices. But it is, ironically, standardized by the rigid definition of what Apple will support. So when security companies like Apperian develop their MAM (mobile application management) solutions [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/samsung-blackberry-who-will-win-the-containerization-wars/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Apple v. Samsung Highlights Insanity of Tech Patents</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/apple-v-samsung-highlights-insanity-of-tech-patents</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/apple-v-samsung-highlights-insanity-of-tech-patents#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 08:17:07 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Highlights]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Insanity]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/apple-v-samsung-highlights-insanity-of-tech-patents</guid> <description><![CDATA[Patent litigation has become standard business practice in the tech world, and no rivalry demonstrates that better than Apple and Samsung. The ongoing trial between the two smartphone and tablet leaders is the poster child for all that is wrong with tech patents. Trolling v. Decency &#8230; Net Work]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/apple-v-samsung-highlights-insanity-of-tech-patents/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Samsung Focus 2: At $49 You Can&#8217;t Afford Not to Check It Out</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/samsung-focus-2-at-49-you-cant-afford-not-to-check-it-out</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/samsung-focus-2-at-49-you-cant-afford-not-to-check-it-out#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 20:13:10 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Afford]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Can't]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Check]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Focus]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/samsung-focus-2-at-49-you-cant-afford-not-to-check-it-out</guid> <description><![CDATA[The Samsung Focus 2 has been outed this week at CTIA in New Orleans. The next generation Windows Phone smartphone will be available from AT&#38;T beginning May 20 for the bargain price of just $ 49 with a two-year contract. A while back I wrote an article asking “Is the Nokia Lumia 900 the Best [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/samsung-focus-2-at-49-you-cant-afford-not-to-check-it-out/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 Doomed by Price?</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/samsung-galaxy-tab-2-doomed-by-price</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/samsung-galaxy-tab-2-doomed-by-price#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:13:02 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Doomed]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Galaxy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Price]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/samsung-galaxy-tab-2-doomed-by-price</guid> <description><![CDATA[There are reports of alleged pricing information being leaked for the upcoming Samsung Galaxy Tab 2. If the information is accurate, Samsung has apparently not learned any lessons from its tablet experience thus far, or from the challenges and failures of its rivals. Pricing the Galaxy Tab 2 too high would virtually ensure it is [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/samsung-galaxy-tab-2-doomed-by-price/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Why Samsung Took the Apple Patent Battle International</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/why-samsung-took-the-apple-patent-battle-international</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/why-samsung-took-the-apple-patent-battle-international#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 02:15:03 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Battle]]></category> <category><![CDATA[International]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Patent]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Took]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/why-samsung-took-the-apple-patent-battle-international</guid> <description><![CDATA[It is no surprise that Samsung retaliated against Apple&#8217;s claims of patent infringement with some patent accusations of its own, but the fact that Samsung chose to file lawsuits internationally against Apple in three different countries seems a bit perplexing. While it may seem like a random move on the part of Samsung to include [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/why-samsung-took-the-apple-patent-battle-international/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Samsung Countersues Apple in Ongoing Patent Silliness</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/samsung-countersues-apple-in-ongoing-patent-silliness</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/samsung-countersues-apple-in-ongoing-patent-silliness#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 14:24:33 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Countersues]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ongoing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Patent]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Silliness]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/samsung-countersues-apple-in-ongoing-patent-silliness</guid> <description><![CDATA[Are you sitting down? This might come as a complete surprise. Samsung has responded to Apple&#8217;s patent infringement claims by&#8230;wait for it&#8211;countersuing with claims of its own that Apple is infringing on Samsung patents. I know, right? Total shocker. In response to Apple filing patent infringement claims in the US District Court of Northern California, [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/samsung-countersues-apple-in-ongoing-patent-silliness/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>