<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>IPHere &#187; Sense</title> <atom:link href="https://www.iphere.com/tag/sense/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>https://www.iphere.com</link> <description>We show your current IP</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 14:13:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en-US</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator> <item><title>Why a larger Surface Pro makes more sense</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/why-a-larger-surface-pro-makes-more-sense</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/why-a-larger-surface-pro-makes-more-sense#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2014 20:15:02 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Larger]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Makes]]></category> <category><![CDATA[More]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Sense]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Surface]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/why-a-larger-surface-pro-makes-more-sense</guid> <description><![CDATA[Microsoft is hosting a media event in New York tomorrow, ostensibly to unveil new models of its Surface tablet line. Most of the speculation suggests Microsoft will announce some sort of “Surface Mini,” but a larger “Surface XL”—or something to that effect—would be much more useful. I speak from experience. Most of the time, I’m working [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/why-a-larger-surface-pro-makes-more-sense/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Why Microsoft&#8217;s Office for iPad strategy still doesn&#8217;t make sense</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/why-microsofts-office-for-ipad-strategy-still-doesnt-make-sense</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/why-microsofts-office-for-ipad-strategy-still-doesnt-make-sense#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2013 20:13:39 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA['Office]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Doesn't]]></category> <category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Microsoft's]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Sense]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Still]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/why-microsofts-office-for-ipad-strategy-still-doesnt-make-sense</guid> <description><![CDATA[Ballmer has re-ignited anticipation for an iPad version of the Microsoft Office suite. Don’t get too excited yet, though. Ballmer told an audience at a Gartner event in Florida that the iPad version won’t come until after a touch-first version is developed for Windows. My first reaction to the news was to shake my head [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/why-microsofts-office-for-ipad-strategy-still-doesnt-make-sense/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Making Sense of the New AT&amp;T Data Plans</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/making-sense-of-the-new-att-data-plans</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/making-sense-of-the-new-att-data-plans#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 14:14:15 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category> <category><![CDATA[data]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Making]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Plans]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Sense]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/making-sense-of-the-new-att-data-plans</guid> <description><![CDATA[AT&#38;T is at it again. In June of 2010, AT&#38;T pulled the plug on its unlimited data plans and switched to tiered bandwidth plans. Now, AT&#38;T is switching things up again – giving customers more megabytes per dollar, but charging more money in the process. So, which AT&#38;T data plan is right for you? Currently, [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/making-sense-of-the-new-att-data-plans/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Day 18: Google Docs Translations Don&#8217;t Make Sense</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/day-18-google-docs-translations-dont-make-sense</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/day-18-google-docs-translations-dont-make-sense#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 14:13:47 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Docs]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Don't]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Google]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Sense]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Translations]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/day-18-google-docs-translations-dont-make-sense</guid> <description><![CDATA[30 Days With&#8230;Google Docs: Day 18 One of the features touted by Google for Google Docs is the ability to easily translate documents into 53 different languages. For day 18 of 30 Days With&#8230;Google Docs I decided to put those translations to the test. I don&#8217;t do a lot of work internationally that would require [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/day-18-google-docs-translations-dont-make-sense/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>