<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>IPHere &#187; Standards</title> <atom:link href="https://www.iphere.com/tag/standards/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>https://www.iphere.com</link> <description>We show your current IP</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 14:13:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en-US</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator> <item><title>OpenDaylight Panel: Fewer SDN Standards, Easier Adoption</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/opendaylight-panel-fewer-sdn-standards-easier-adoption</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/opendaylight-panel-fewer-sdn-standards-easier-adoption#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2014 02:13:22 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Adoption]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Easier]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Fewer]]></category> <category><![CDATA[OpenDaylight]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Panel]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/opendaylight-panel-fewer-sdn-standards-easier-adoption</guid> <description><![CDATA[Experts addressed software-defined networking issues at the inaugural OpenDaylight Summit. Network Computing]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/opendaylight-panel-fewer-sdn-standards-easier-adoption/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Do NIST Information Security Standards Matter?</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/do-nist-information-security-standards-matter</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/do-nist-information-security-standards-matter#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2013 08:15:50 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Information]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Matter]]></category> <category><![CDATA[NIST]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/do-nist-information-security-standards-matter</guid> <description><![CDATA[The information security field is awash in regulations and requirements, but National Institute of Standards and Technology standards provide a strong foundation for an information security program. Network Computing]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/do-nist-information-security-standards-matter/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>NIST Security Standards: Fallacies And Pitfalls</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/nist-security-standards-fallacies-and-pitfalls</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/nist-security-standards-fallacies-and-pitfalls#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2013 14:12:47 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Fallacies]]></category> <category><![CDATA[NIST]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Pitfalls]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/nist-security-standards-fallacies-and-pitfalls</guid> <description><![CDATA[Given the rise of cybercrime over the last few years, few would argue that the federal government is doing enough to address the risks, although the National Institute of Standards and Technology has been trying. Earlier this year, NIST developed Revision 4 of its 800-53 standard that aims to set a higher standard of security [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/nist-security-standards-fallacies-and-pitfalls/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Should Amazon Define Cloud Standards?</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/should-amazon-define-cloud-standards</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/should-amazon-define-cloud-standards#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 20:19:03 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cloud]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Define]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Should]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/should-amazon-define-cloud-standards</guid> <description><![CDATA[Since Citrix gave Cloudstack to the Apache Software Foundation, there has been a lot of blogging, tweeting, and arguing about whether cloud computing software vendors should simply let Amazon AWS drive cloud computing standards. It&#8217;s time for the stakeholders&#8211;enterprises, vendors, open source projects, and anyone else interested to start scoping, developing, and implementing standards that [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/should-amazon-define-cloud-standards/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Network Buyers Survey: Standards Trump Features</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/network-buyers-survey-standards-trump-features</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/network-buyers-survey-standards-trump-features#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 02:13:11 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Buyers]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Features]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Network]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Survey]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Trump]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/network-buyers-survey-standards-trump-features</guid> <description><![CDATA[When it comes to buying new network equipment, enterprise customers prefer technology built to industry standards over products that may have innovative, but proprietary, features, a newly released survey shows. Although network vendors, including industry leader Cisco Systems, are introducing innovations such as 40 Gbit Ethernet connectivity, multipath schemes such as fabric networks and converged [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/network-buyers-survey-standards-trump-features/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Amazon Cloud Services Meet Federal Security Standards</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/amazon-cloud-services-meet-federal-security-standards</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/amazon-cloud-services-meet-federal-security-standards#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 20:12:43 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cloud]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Meet]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Services]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/amazon-cloud-services-meet-federal-security-standards</guid> <description><![CDATA[Key pieces of Amazon Web Services&#8217; (AWS) cloud-computing infrastructure have achieved certification with the federal standard for IT security solutions, making the services a more viable option for adoption among federal agencies. Network Computing]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/amazon-cloud-services-meet-federal-security-standards/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>FCoE: Standards Don&#8217;t Matter; Vendor Choice Does</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/fcoe-standards-dont-matter-vendor-choice-does</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/fcoe-standards-dont-matter-vendor-choice-does#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 14:13:30 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Choice]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Don't]]></category> <category><![CDATA[FCoE]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Matter]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Vendor]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/fcoe-standards-dont-matter-vendor-choice-does</guid> <description><![CDATA[Over the last year or so, some FCoE experts have been arguing nuances of FCoE and which protocols you need or don&#8217;t need. FCoE inter-swich interoperability? I will be old(er) and gray(er) before that happens in any meaningful way. While they are interesting discussions&#8212;if you go for that sort of thing&#8212;ultimately, they won&#8217;t impact you&#8217;re [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/fcoe-standards-dont-matter-vendor-choice-does/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Open Data Center Alliance Sets Standards For Cloud Providers</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/open-data-center-alliance-sets-standards-for-cloud-providers</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/open-data-center-alliance-sets-standards-for-cloud-providers#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 14:14:58 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Alliance]]></category> <category><![CDATA[center]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cloud]]></category> <category><![CDATA[data]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Open]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Providers]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Sets]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/open-data-center-alliance-sets-standards-for-cloud-providers</guid> <description><![CDATA[A group of 280 global companies has joined together to lay down industry standards for cloud computing that cloud providers would adopt to assure customers of what they&#8217;re getting for their investment in the cloud. The Open Data Center Alliance on Tuesday released the standards that, if adopted, will clear up some of the questions [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/open-data-center-alliance-sets-standards-for-cloud-providers/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Cisco&#8217;s FabricPath and IETF TRILL: Cisco Can&#8217;t Have Standards Both Ways</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/ciscos-fabricpath-and-ietf-trill-cisco-cant-have-standards-both-ways</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/ciscos-fabricpath-and-ietf-trill-cisco-cant-have-standards-both-ways#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 16:34:26 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Both]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Can't]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cisco's]]></category> <category><![CDATA[FabricPath]]></category> <category><![CDATA[IETF]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category> <category><![CDATA[TRILL]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ways]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/ciscos-fabricpath-and-ietf-trill-cisco-cant-have-standards-both-ways</guid> <description><![CDATA[Standards are standards for a reason. Standards allow customers to interconnect products with a hope that they will all work together easily and simply. It&#8217;s how the Internet was built, though not without some problems, and how all the networking vendors built their businesses. No vendor, not even Cisco or Hewlett-Packard, can go it alone [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/ciscos-fabricpath-and-ietf-trill-cisco-cant-have-standards-both-ways/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>