<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>IPHere &#187; Still</title> <atom:link href="https://www.iphere.com/tag/still/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>https://www.iphere.com</link> <description>We show your current IP</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 14:13:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en-US</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator> <item><title>Virtual servers still face real security threats</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/virtual-servers-still-face-real-security-threats</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/virtual-servers-still-face-real-security-threats#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2014 08:14:29 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA['Real]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Face]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Servers]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Still]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Threats]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Virtual]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/virtual-servers-still-face-real-security-threats</guid> <description><![CDATA[Don’t let the word “virtual” in virtual servers fool you. You’re the only one who knows it’s virtual. From the perspective of the virtual server itself, the devices connected to it, applications running on it, end-users connecting to it, or security threats trying to compromise it, the server is very, very real. A new survey [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/virtual-servers-still-face-real-security-threats/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Internet Explorer is still the star of Patch Tuesday</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/internet-explorer-is-still-the-star-of-patch-tuesday</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/internet-explorer-is-still-the-star-of-patch-tuesday#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2014 20:19:36 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Explorer]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Patch]]></category> <category><![CDATA[star]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Still]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Tuesday]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/internet-explorer-is-still-the-star-of-patch-tuesday</guid> <description><![CDATA[It’s déjà vu all over again. After a mind-blowing 59 separate vulnerabilities were patched in Internet Explorer last month, the Microsoft Web browser is hogging the spotlight again in July. As predicted last week, Microsoft published six new security bulletins for the July Patch Tuesday, and only two of them are rated as Critical. There are also three [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/internet-explorer-is-still-the-star-of-patch-tuesday/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Spam turns 20 and is still going strong</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/spam-turns-20-and-is-still-going-strong</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/spam-turns-20-and-is-still-going-strong#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 20:18:44 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Going]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Still]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Strong]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Turns]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/spam-turns-20-and-is-still-going-strong</guid> <description><![CDATA[We recently passed an Internet milestone: April 12 marked the 20-year anniversary of commercialized spam. But even with two decades and trillions of unsolicited messages behind us, it seems there is still no end in sight. There were certainly unsolicited messages sent before April 11, 1994, but that&#8217;s the day two lawyers pitched a green [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/spam-turns-20-and-is-still-going-strong/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Why Microsoft&#8217;s Office for iPad strategy still doesn&#8217;t make sense</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/why-microsofts-office-for-ipad-strategy-still-doesnt-make-sense</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/why-microsofts-office-for-ipad-strategy-still-doesnt-make-sense#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2013 20:13:39 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA['Office]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Doesn't]]></category> <category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Microsoft's]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Sense]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Still]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/why-microsofts-office-for-ipad-strategy-still-doesnt-make-sense</guid> <description><![CDATA[Ballmer has re-ignited anticipation for an iPad version of the Microsoft Office suite. Don’t get too excited yet, though. Ballmer told an audience at a Gartner event in Florida that the iPad version won’t come until after a touch-first version is developed for Windows. My first reaction to the news was to shake my head [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/why-microsofts-office-for-ipad-strategy-still-doesnt-make-sense/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Surface RT price still misses the sweet spot for business</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/surface-rt-price-still-misses-the-sweet-spot-for-business</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/surface-rt-price-still-misses-the-sweet-spot-for-business#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2013 20:13:53 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Business]]></category> <category><![CDATA[misses]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Price]]></category> <category><![CDATA[spot]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Still]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Surface]]></category> <category><![CDATA[sweet]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/surface-rt-price-still-misses-the-sweet-spot-for-business</guid> <description><![CDATA[Microsoft has slashed the price of the Surface RT to $ 350 in an effort to spark demand for the tablet. While it’s a move in the right direction, it’s a little late, and it still doesn’t go far enough to make the Surface RT attractive for business use in a market dominated by Apple’s iPad. Martyn Williams [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/surface-rt-price-still-misses-the-sweet-spot-for-business/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Take steps to secure what little online privacy you still have</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/take-steps-to-secure-what-little-online-privacy-you-still-have</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/take-steps-to-secure-what-little-online-privacy-you-still-have#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 02:12:45 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Little]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Online]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Secure]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Steps]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Still]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Take]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/take-steps-to-secure-what-little-online-privacy-you-still-have</guid> <description><![CDATA[Before you can take steps to protect your privacy, you need to define just what the word means. And the second task can be more difficult given the spread of social-networking tools and Big Brother legislation such as CISPA. Microsoft&#8217;s recently launched privacy-awareness campaign includes a survey ostensibly designed to help consumers determine their &#8220;privacy type,&#8221; based [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/take-steps-to-secure-what-little-online-privacy-you-still-have/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>More Data On Attackers, But Attribution Still Dodgy</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/more-data-on-attackers-but-attribution-still-dodgy</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/more-data-on-attackers-but-attribution-still-dodgy#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2013 14:12:46 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Attackers]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Attribution]]></category> <category><![CDATA[data]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Dodgy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[More]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Still]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/more-data-on-attackers-but-attribution-still-dodgy</guid> <description><![CDATA[Following the compromise of The New York Times&#8217; network, Mandiant&#8211;the company that responded to the incident and conducted the forensics analysis&#8211;collected enough evidence to identify the attacker. Yet, &#8220;identify&#8221; is a loaded word in the field of digital forensics and the name that the company had for the perpetrators came down to an internal designation: [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/more-data-on-attackers-but-attribution-still-dodgy/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Bitten By SaaS, But Still Going Back</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/bitten-by-saas-but-still-going-back</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/bitten-by-saas-but-still-going-back#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2012 14:13:46 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Back]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Bitten]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Going]]></category> <category><![CDATA[SaaS]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Still]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/bitten-by-saas-but-still-going-back</guid> <description><![CDATA[A SaaS application I rely on shut down recently. No massive disruption ensued, but it&#8217;s a reminder that companies must take steps to mitigate the potential loss of a SaaS provider. Network Computing]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/bitten-by-saas-but-still-going-back/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Organizations Still Need Niche Vendors to Round Out Mobility Strategy</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/organizations-still-need-niche-vendors-to-round-out-mobility-strategy</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/organizations-still-need-niche-vendors-to-round-out-mobility-strategy#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 08:18:18 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Mobility]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Need]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Niche]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Organizations]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Round]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Still]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Vendors]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/organizations-still-need-niche-vendors-to-round-out-mobility-strategy</guid> <description><![CDATA[Organizations are turning to managed service providers for a more holistic approach to a mobility strategy, according to a recent survey. The problem? Providers and vendors still aren&#8217;t able to offer end-to-end services. That&#8217;s where niche vendors come in. Network Computing]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/organizations-still-need-niche-vendors-to-round-out-mobility-strategy/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Windows 8 &#8216;Metro&#8217; Is Dead, But UI Still Needs a Name</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/windows-8-metro-is-dead-but-ui-still-needs-a-name</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/windows-8-metro-is-dead-but-ui-still-needs-a-name#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 08:22:53 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA['Metro']]></category> <category><![CDATA[Dead]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Name]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Needs]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Still]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/windows-8-metro-is-dead-but-ui-still-needs-a-name</guid> <description><![CDATA[Whatever the reason, “Metro” is out, and Microsoft is temporarily referring to the colorful, tiled interface of the impending flagship operating system as “Windows 8 Style UI”. That lacks flare, though, and isn’t exactly a name that captures the imagination. Microsoft needs something catchy to brand the unique interface and differentiate it from the desktop [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/windows-8-metro-is-dead-but-ui-still-needs-a-name/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>