<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>IPHere &#187; Surprises</title> <atom:link href="https://www.iphere.com/tag/surprises/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>https://www.iphere.com</link> <description>We show your current IP</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 14:13:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en-US</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator> <item><title>5 Ways To Avoid Costly Cloud Surprises</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/5-ways-to-avoid-costly-cloud-surprises</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/5-ways-to-avoid-costly-cloud-surprises#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 08:12:50 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Avoid]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cloud]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Costly]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Surprises]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ways]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/5-ways-to-avoid-costly-cloud-surprises</guid> <description><![CDATA[Use of infrastructure as service is growing, but do users know what they&#8217;re doing in the cloud? Two critical analyses would suggest that they don&#8217;t. Cloudyn is one of several usage assessment and optimization firms that have been started to serve cloud customers. These new companies often make a basic online service available for free, [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/5-ways-to-avoid-costly-cloud-surprises/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>OpenStack Surprises Involve Hyper-V, Solid State</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/openstack-surprises-involve-hyper-v-solid-state</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/openstack-surprises-involve-hyper-v-solid-state#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 08:25:34 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[HyperV]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Involve]]></category> <category><![CDATA[OpenStack]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Solid]]></category> <category><![CDATA[State]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Surprises]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/openstack-surprises-involve-hyper-v-solid-state</guid> <description><![CDATA[One measure of how fast the OpenStack open source code project has gained mindshare is the appearance of two developments that few in the OpenStack community thought likely or even possible. They&#8217;ve been created by independent third parties, one a member of the project and another outside it. In the first instance, Hostway.com sought to [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/openstack-surprises-involve-hyper-v-solid-state/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Cisco&#8217;s Rumored Quasi-Proprietary SDN Strategy Irks Some, Surprises Few</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/ciscos-rumored-quasi-proprietary-sdn-strategy-irks-some-surprises-few</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/ciscos-rumored-quasi-proprietary-sdn-strategy-irks-some-surprises-few#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 14:15:18 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cisco's]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Irks]]></category> <category><![CDATA[QuasiProprietary]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Rumored]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Some]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Surprises]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/ciscos-rumored-quasi-proprietary-sdn-strategy-irks-some-surprises-few</guid> <description><![CDATA[Cisco Systems&#8217; hint that it may introduce software-defined networking (SDN) technology that would not be based on the OpenFlow protocol prompted complaints from competing networking vendors and the OpenFlow community that Cisco was making another vendor lock-in play by offering proprietary technology, rather than standards-based products. Industry analysts say it&#8217;s to be expected that Cisco [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/ciscos-rumored-quasi-proprietary-sdn-strategy-irks-some-surprises-few/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>