<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>IPHere &#187; U.S.</title> <atom:link href="https://www.iphere.com/tag/u-s/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>https://www.iphere.com</link> <description>We show your current IP</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 14:13:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en-US</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator> <item><title>South Korea wireless speed leaves U.S. service in the dust</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/south-korea-wireless-speed-leaves-u-s-service-in-the-dust</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/south-korea-wireless-speed-leaves-u-s-service-in-the-dust#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2014 14:12:49 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Dust]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Korea]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Leaves]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Service]]></category> <category><![CDATA[South]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Speed]]></category> <category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Wireless]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/south-korea-wireless-speed-leaves-u-s-service-in-the-dust</guid> <description><![CDATA[Wireless service providers in the United States are constantly battling each other over which has the largest or fastest wireless network. Verizon, AT&#38;T, Sprint, and T-Mobile are just big fish swimming in a small pond, though, because none of them can come close to what wireless providers are delivering in South Korea—not even on their [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/south-korea-wireless-speed-leaves-u-s-service-in-the-dust/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>NSA&#8217;s Prism Could Cost U.S. Cloud Companies $45 Billion</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/nsas-prism-could-cost-u-s-cloud-companies-45-billion</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/nsas-prism-could-cost-u-s-cloud-companies-45-billion#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2013 14:12:45 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Billion]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cloud]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cost]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Could]]></category> <category><![CDATA[NSA's]]></category> <category><![CDATA[PRISM]]></category> <category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/nsas-prism-could-cost-u-s-cloud-companies-45-billion</guid> <description><![CDATA[The revelations about the monitoring of phone calls, emails and Internet traffic by the National Security Agency&#8217;s Prism program will cost U.S. cloud suppliers either $ 35 billion, $ 45 billion, or maybe not so much, depending on how you interpret recent data on the continued use of hosting services, according to analysts looking at [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/nsas-prism-could-cost-u-s-cloud-companies-45-billion/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Huawei Responds to &#8220;Not Interested in U.S.&#8221; Comments</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/huawei-responds-to-not-interested-in-u-s-comments</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/huawei-responds-to-not-interested-in-u-s-comments#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 08:20:50 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Comments]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Huawei]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Interested]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Responds]]></category> <category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/huawei-responds-to-not-interested-in-u-s-comments</guid> <description><![CDATA[Huawei will continue to sell in the United States, but the company doesn&#8217;t consider the U.S. to be a growth area or primary revenue source for its carrier business, according to a Huawei spokesperson. Network Computing]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/huawei-responds-to-not-interested-in-u-s-comments/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Huawei Quits U.S. Market</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/huawei-quits-u-s-market</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/huawei-quits-u-s-market#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 02:17:11 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Huawei]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Market]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Quits]]></category> <category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/huawei-quits-u-s-market</guid> <description><![CDATA[Huawei announced Tuesday it is no longer interested in the U.S. market. The move follows a string of rulings by the U.S. government that stopped Huawei from bidding on both public and private contracts. Network Computing]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/huawei-quits-u-s-market/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Huawei Hits Back At U.S. Security Investigation</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/huawei-hits-back-at-u-s-security-investigation</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/huawei-hits-back-at-u-s-security-investigation#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 20:12:43 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Back]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Hits]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Huawei]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Investigation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/huawei-hits-back-at-u-s-security-investigation</guid> <description><![CDATA[The recent U.S. House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence report, which concludes that Huawei Technologies and ZTE are a security threat, is a case of &#8220;Americans being Americans,&#8221; according to Huawei&#8217;s VP for Western Europe. (See U.S. vs Huawei/ZTE: The Verdict.) Speaking to the media in central London following a morning of broadband market discussions [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/huawei-hits-back-at-u-s-security-investigation/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Verisign Studies: Externally Managed DNS Improves Uptime; DDoS Hits Two-Thirds Of U.S. Organizations</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/verisign-studies-externally-managed-dns-improves-uptime-ddos-hits-two-thirds-of-u-s-organizations</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/verisign-studies-externally-managed-dns-improves-uptime-ddos-hits-two-thirds-of-u-s-organizations#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 20:32:54 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[DDoS]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Externally]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Hits]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Improves]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Managed]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Organizations]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Studies]]></category> <category><![CDATA[TwoThirds]]></category> <category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Uptime]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Verisign]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/verisign-studies-externally-managed-dns-improves-uptime-ddos-hits-two-thirds-of-u-s-organizations</guid> <description><![CDATA[Organizations that outsource DNS management to specialized service providers experience half the downtime of those that manage DNS internally or rely on their ISPs, according to a study commissioned by Verisign. And, in another report, a Verisign survey showed that nearly two-thirds of the responding companies experienced distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks, although more than 80% [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/verisign-studies-externally-managed-dns-improves-uptime-ddos-hits-two-thirds-of-u-s-organizations/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>U.S. Data Breach Costs Still Increasing, Ponemon Survey Reports</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/u-s-data-breach-costs-still-increasing-ponemon-survey-reports</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/u-s-data-breach-costs-still-increasing-ponemon-survey-reports#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 16:36:59 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Breach]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Costs]]></category> <category><![CDATA[data]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Increasing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ponemon]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Reports]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Still]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Survey]]></category> <category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/u-s-data-breach-costs-still-increasing-ponemon-survey-reports</guid> <description><![CDATA[The cost of U.S. data breaches continues to rise, according to a Ponemon Institute survey, reaching an average cost of $ 7.2 million in 2010, up 7 percent from $ 6.8 million the previous year. The cost has increased every year since the first was released in 2006. That broke down to $ 214 per [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/u-s-data-breach-costs-still-increasing-ponemon-survey-reports/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>