<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>IPHere &#187; Vendors</title> <atom:link href="https://www.iphere.com/tag/vendors/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>https://www.iphere.com</link> <description>We show your current IP</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 14:13:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en-US</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator> <item><title>Networking Vendors Issue Heartbleed Fixes</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/networking-vendors-issue-heartbleed-fixes</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/networking-vendors-issue-heartbleed-fixes#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 14:13:47 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA['Fixes']]></category> <category><![CDATA[Heartbleed]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Issue]]></category> <category><![CDATA[networking]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Vendors]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/networking-vendors-issue-heartbleed-fixes</guid> <description><![CDATA[Cisco and Juniper report progress in addressing far-reaching OpenSSL vulnerability that hit switches, VPNs and other products. Network Computing]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/networking-vendors-issue-heartbleed-fixes/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>SDN Strategies Part 1: Vendors Vie For Market, Mindshare</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/sdn-strategies-part-1-vendors-vie-for-market-mindshare</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/sdn-strategies-part-1-vendors-vie-for-market-mindshare#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 20:13:51 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Market]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Mindshare]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Part]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Strategies]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Vendors]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/sdn-strategies-part-1-vendors-vie-for-market-mindshare</guid> <description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s a land grab in the software-defined networking market, with heavyweights and startups rolling out an array of technologies for automating the network. Network Computing]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/sdn-strategies-part-1-vendors-vie-for-market-mindshare/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>SDN Vendors&#8217; Internal Tug-of-War Doesn&#8217;t Bode Well For Customers</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/sdn-vendors-internal-tug-of-war-doesnt-bode-well-for-customers</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/sdn-vendors-internal-tug-of-war-doesnt-bode-well-for-customers#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2014 08:20:38 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Bode]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Customers]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Doesn't]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Internal]]></category> <category><![CDATA[TugofWar]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Vendors]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Well]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/sdn-vendors-internal-tug-of-war-doesnt-bode-well-for-customers</guid> <description><![CDATA[Networking vendors are experiencing internal conflict as they try to integrate SDN into their products lines. Customers will face the fallout. Network Computing]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/sdn-vendors-internal-tug-of-war-doesnt-bode-well-for-customers/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>3 Ways Vendors Aggravate Network Engineers</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/3-ways-vendors-aggravate-network-engineers</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/3-ways-vendors-aggravate-network-engineers#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2014 20:15:46 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Aggravate]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Engineers]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Network]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Vendors]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ways]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/3-ways-vendors-aggravate-network-engineers</guid> <description><![CDATA[Engineers love new networking gear, but vendors can drive them crazy. Here are the top three vendor bad habits that can send engineers over the edge. Network Computing]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/3-ways-vendors-aggravate-network-engineers/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>ADC Vendors Continue To Fill Cisco ACE Void</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/adc-vendors-continue-to-fill-cisco-ace-void</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/adc-vendors-continue-to-fill-cisco-ace-void#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2013 08:12:45 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Continue]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Fill]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Vendors]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Void]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/adc-vendors-continue-to-fill-cisco-ace-void</guid> <description><![CDATA[As organizations phase out Cisco&#8217;s discontinued ACE application delivery controller, vendors fill the gap with hardware, virtual, and cloud-based replacements. Network Computing]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/adc-vendors-continue-to-fill-cisco-ace-void/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Hardware Vs. Software: Storage Vendors Go Head-to-Head</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/hardware-vs-software-storage-vendors-go-head-to-head</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/hardware-vs-software-storage-vendors-go-head-to-head#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 14 Sep 2013 14:14:38 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category> <category><![CDATA[headtohead]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Software]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Vendors]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/hardware-vs-software-storage-vendors-go-head-to-head</guid> <description><![CDATA[Don&#8217;t count hardware storage vendors out as the industry shifts to software-based infrastructure. Hardware and software vendors are making moves that promise storage innovation in both traditional infrastructure and SDI. Network Computing]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/hardware-vs-software-storage-vendors-go-head-to-head/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>VMware NSX: Boom Or Bust For Security Vendors?</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/vmware-nsx-boom-or-bust-for-security-vendors</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/vmware-nsx-boom-or-bust-for-security-vendors#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2013 20:13:15 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Boom]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Bust]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Vendors]]></category> <category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/vmware-nsx-boom-or-bust-for-security-vendors</guid> <description><![CDATA[As VMware provides more firewall and other security functionality through its network virtualization platform, where does that leave security companies? Network Computing]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/vmware-nsx-boom-or-bust-for-security-vendors/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>802.11ac: Time To Change Vendors?</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/802-11ac-time-to-change-vendors</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/802-11ac-time-to-change-vendors#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 03 Aug 2013 14:19:12 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[802.11ac]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Change]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Time]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Vendors]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/802-11ac-time-to-change-vendors</guid> <description><![CDATA[Enterprise WLANs are facing massive change with the arrival of certified 802.11ac products. Take this opportunity to consider other vendors as you upgrade. Network Computing]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/802-11ac-time-to-change-vendors/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>SSD Vendors: Which Will Win?</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/ssd-vendors-which-will-win</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/ssd-vendors-which-will-win#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jul 2013 08:14:05 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Vendors]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/ssd-vendors-which-will-win</guid> <description><![CDATA[As the SSD market consolidates, companies that run flash foundries and established storage vendors may have the edge. Network Computing]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/ssd-vendors-which-will-win/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>IT Vendors Need More Pricing Transparency</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/it-vendors-need-more-pricing-transparency</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/it-vendors-need-more-pricing-transparency#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 02:15:08 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[More]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Need]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Pricing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Transparency]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Vendors]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/it-vendors-need-more-pricing-transparency</guid> <description><![CDATA[Compiling our SDN product comparison provided a vivid lesson in the difficulty of getting meaningful prices for enterprise IT equipment. Network Computing]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/it-vendors-need-more-pricing-transparency/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>