<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>IPHere &#187; Year</title> <atom:link href="https://www.iphere.com/tag/year/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>https://www.iphere.com</link> <description>We show your current IP</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 14:13:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en-US</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator> <item><title>Will 2014 Be The Year Of 10 Gigabit Ethernet?</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/will-2014-be-the-year-of-10-gigabit-ethernet</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/will-2014-be-the-year-of-10-gigabit-ethernet#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2014 20:13:35 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[2014]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ethernet]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Gigabit]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Year]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/will-2014-be-the-year-of-10-gigabit-ethernet</guid> <description><![CDATA[10GbE adoption has been slow, but it&#8217;s finally on its way to becoming mainstream in the datacenter. Will this be the year it surpasses 1GbE? Network Computing]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/will-2014-be-the-year-of-10-gigabit-ethernet/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Networking 2013: The Year of SDN</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/networking-2013-the-year-of-sdn</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/networking-2013-the-year-of-sdn#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 02:12:48 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[2013]]></category> <category><![CDATA[networking]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Year]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/networking-2013-the-year-of-sdn</guid> <description><![CDATA[Software-defined networking and network virtualization grabbed the industry by the throat in 2013, dominating almost every conversation about the future of networking. The year also was marked by major M&#038;A deals, the arrival of 802.11ac products, and the ongoing Huawei saga. Here, we take you back through some of the memorable moments in networking in [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/networking-2013-the-year-of-sdn/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Cloud Storage: See You Next Year</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/cloud-storage-see-you-next-year</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/cloud-storage-see-you-next-year#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 14:13:00 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cloud]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Next]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Year]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/cloud-storage-see-you-next-year</guid> <description><![CDATA[If cloud storage was one of the few bright spots in information technology in 2011, the trend is likely to continue through 2012, for many of the same reasons, analysts and vendors say. Predictions for 2012 in the area of cloud storage include continuing support by small- and medium-sized businesses; improved linkages between public cloud [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/cloud-storage-see-you-next-year/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>2011 Was An Awesome Year For Networking</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/2011-was-an-awesome-year-for-networking</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/2011-was-an-awesome-year-for-networking#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 14:13:47 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[2011]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Awesome]]></category> <category><![CDATA[networking]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Year]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/2011-was-an-awesome-year-for-networking</guid> <description><![CDATA[After about eight or nine years of networking innovation stagnation, the number of new innovations starting in 2010 and exploding in 2011 is astounding. Speed and feeds are increasing, but the exciting work in 2011 occurred in new technologies to support initiatives such as cloud computing, storage and data convergence, as well as migrating to [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/2011-was-an-awesome-year-for-networking/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Year In Review: Cloud Storage&#8217;s Silver Lining</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/year-in-review-cloud-storages-silver-lining</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/year-in-review-cloud-storages-silver-lining#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 20:16:50 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Cloud]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Lining]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Review]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Silver]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Storage's]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Year]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/year-in-review-cloud-storages-silver-lining</guid> <description><![CDATA[While many technologies blamed the laggard economy of 2011 for their failures, cloud storage was one of the few that could point to it for its success. Numerous information technology organizations, facing data growth due to factors such as the requirement to keep data for electronic discovery purposes, found themselves with growing storage requirements yet [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/year-in-review-cloud-storages-silver-lining/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Year In Review: The Good, The Bad And HP</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/year-in-review-the-good-the-bad-and-hp</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/year-in-review-the-good-the-bad-and-hp#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 14:12:51 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Good]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Review]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Year]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/year-in-review-the-good-the-bad-and-hp</guid> <description><![CDATA[As we wrap up another year of doing more with less, it&#8217;s time to look back at the highs and lows of the vendors of IT products, services, panaceas and placebos. Based on the latest quarterly earnings, HP ($ 32.3 billion) had a comfortable lead over Apple ($ 28.27 billion) and third-place IBM ($ 26.2 [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/year-in-review-the-good-the-bad-and-hp/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>RIM&#8217;s No Good, Very Bad Year: A Look Back at 2011</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/rims-no-good-very-bad-year-a-look-back-at-2011</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/rims-no-good-very-bad-year-a-look-back-at-2011#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 02:15:19 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[2011]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Back]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Good]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Look]]></category> <category><![CDATA[RIM's]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Very]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Year]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/rims-no-good-very-bad-year-a-look-back-at-2011</guid> <description><![CDATA[As the final days of 2011 tick away, there is one iconic tech company that is probably thankful this year is finally winding down. RIM has had an epic year &#8212; in the tragic sense &#8212; and has fallen precipitously from its once dominant place among mobile platforms. RIM, and the BlackBerry devices that helped [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/rims-no-good-very-bad-year-a-look-back-at-2011/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Year In Review: Virtualization Hot in 2011</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/year-in-review-virtualization-hot-in-2011</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/year-in-review-virtualization-hot-in-2011#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 20:14:22 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[2011]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Review]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Year]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/year-in-review-virtualization-hot-in-2011</guid> <description><![CDATA[Virtualization was second only to cloud computing as a priority for 2,014 CIOs representing over $ 160 billion in corporate and public-sector IT spending across 50 countries and 38 industries in Gartner&#8217;s 2011 CIO Agenda survey, released in January. While IT budgets were expected to be flat for the year, these technologies were selected as [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/year-in-review-virtualization-hot-in-2011/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Year In Review: VDI Explosion Coming Soon To A Desktop Near You</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/year-in-review-vdi-explosion-coming-soon-to-a-desktop-near-you</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/year-in-review-vdi-explosion-coming-soon-to-a-desktop-near-you#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 20:13:11 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Coming]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Desktop]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Explosion]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Near]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Review]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Soon]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Year]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/year-in-review-vdi-explosion-coming-soon-to-a-desktop-near-you</guid> <description><![CDATA[Towards the end of 2010, Gartner reported that more than 80% of enterprises have a virtualization program or project, and it joined a veritable army of research companies and vendors predicting that the desktop would be virtualized via solutions such as VDI or hosted virtual desktops. However, according to a CDW survey, companies are finding [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/year-in-review-vdi-explosion-coming-soon-to-a-desktop-near-you/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Year In Review: Flash Comes of Age</title><link>https://www.iphere.com/year-in-review-flash-comes-of-age</link> <comments>https://www.iphere.com/year-in-review-flash-comes-of-age#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 20:20:58 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>IPHere</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[General]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Comes]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Review]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Year]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphere.com/year-in-review-flash-comes-of-age</guid> <description><![CDATA[If disk is the heavyweight segment of the storage market, dominated by seven vendors &#8211; three pureplay (EMC, NetApp and HDS) and four IT generalists (IBM, HP, Dell and Oracle/Sun) holding more than 80% of the market, then flash &#8211; solid state &#8211; is the cocky up and comer and 2011 was the year that [&#8230;]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>https://www.iphere.com/year-in-review-flash-comes-of-age/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>